In relation to Python and AI, I often see ** English, but my English ability is too low and I am losing. ** Understand (remember) ** English grammar **, not English words, to master English.
Most of the things I don't understand and think I've lost a little ** lost time ** Is described. For a small part, I already knew about something, but usually I don't know? Because I put it in.
For the time being, for the time being There is a possibility of misreading
I will try to target.
(: sheep: mark, there is room for further consideration)
: exclamation: ** The present participle learns to qualify from the front first, so you may not be accustomed to qualifying from the back? ** **
Description of sys.executable (Source: See Source 1)
String giving the full file pathname of the Python interpreter program running the caller
** Qualified from behind ** 2 places. ** Give the full path ** string A program that ** executes the caller **
Just in case, I'd like you to translate it so that you can agree with Google (translation). (Change to sentences as appropriate.) The result is as follows.
"sys.executable" is a string giving the full file pathname of the Python interpreter program running the caller. |
---|
「sys."Executable" is a string that indicates the full file pathname of the Python interpreter program that is running the caller. |
** Unrestricted usage by ", (comma) which ...". And since the example sentence below is an error message (python), which is omitted: sheep: **
python error message (Source: See Source 2)
Model provided has model identifier '<!', should be 'TFL3'
Just in case, I'd like you to translate it so that you can agree with Google (translation). The result is as follows.
Model provided has model identifier '<!', should be 'TFL3' |
---|
The model identifier "<!! Must be "TFL3" (Mama) |
The model identifier "<!! There is that "<!! Must be "TFL3"(A little postscript) |
Stackoverflow question Source: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/452104/is-it-worth-using-pythons-re-compile
Is it worth using Python's re.compile?
(Does the compile method of the re module make sense?)
In the following English sentence, when I googled, the above came out. I want to refer to it in the future.
why does python re-module needs compile (↑ This is my English, so is it bad? Think of it as an example.)
Python Pocket Reference, 5th Edition Python In Your Pocket By Mark Lutz Publisher: O'Reilly Media
Python37\Lib\site-packages\tflite_runtime
The structure of this article is random.
Recommended Posts